A Praxeology and Internal and External Criticism in Caldwell and Sen:
A Path to the Methodological Pluralism
AbstractThe praxeology formulated by Ludwig von Mises and defined as a general theory of human action, categorizes it as a science in which all individual actions are a priori rational. The axiom all the action is rational is deductively implied by the concept that individuals deliberate act to decrease in personal distress. Such provisions have generated controversy, is the methodological field and the epistemological field. At first, the criticisms are developed which is conventionally external praxeology critical, therefore, by methodological differences. In the second, the challenges consist of the axioms of rationality and logical deductions under the praxeological methodology. So, are called internal criticism of praxeology Mises. Here, we present such concepts and differences, concluding that the road to praxeology is not necessarily in its refutation, and yes, the evolution towards an essentially conceptualized by Bruce Caldwell pluralistic methodological way.
CALDWELL, B. Praxeology and It Critics: An Appraisal. History of Political Economy, v. 16:3, s/l, 1984, p. 363-379.
CALDWELL, B. The Case of Pluralism. In: MARCHI, Nome. The Popperian Legacy in Economics, s/l, 1985.
CALDWELL, B. Towards a Broader Conception of Criticism, History of Political Economy, v. 18, n. 4, s/l, 1986.
CHALMERS, A. F. O que é ciência afinal? Editora Brasiliense, São Paulo, 1993.
FEIJÓ, R. Ludwig von Mises: as Bases de sua Epistemologia e uma Proposta de Crítica Internalista. Revista de Economia política, v. 20, s/l, 2000.
FEIJÓ, R.; BARBIERI, F. Metodologia do Pensamento Econômico. Atlas, São Paulo, 2013.
GUNNING, J. P. Professor Caldwell on Ludwig von Mises' Methodology. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 3, Springer, 1988.
HIRSCH, A. Caldwell on Praxeology and Its Critics: A Reappraisal. History of Political Economy, v. 18, n. 4, s/l, 1986.
HODGSON, M. G. Austrian Economics, Evolutionary Psychology and Individual Actions. In: KOPPL, R. Evolutionary Psychology and Economic Theory: Advances in Austrian Economics, v.7, Elsevier, 2004, p. 61-78.
HODGSON. Individuals and institutions: interaction and evolution. Organization Studies, v. 28(1), s/l, 2007, p. 95-116.
HOPPE, H. H. A Ciência Econômica e o Método Austríaco. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2010.
KANT, I. Crítica da Razão Pura. Icone, São Paulo, 2007.
LACHMAN. L. An Austrian Stocktaking: Unsettled Questions and Tentative Answers. Spadaro, s/l, 1978, p. 1-18.
LENZ; M. H.; LÖW, D. A. Der Methodenstreit - A Batalha dos Métodos: principais pontos do debate. In: Anais XVIII Encontro Nacional de Economia Política, local, 2013.
MISES, L. V. Ação humana: Um Tratado de Economia. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2010.
MISES, L. V. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, 2003.
MISES, L. V. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. D. Van Nostrand Inc, New Jersey, 1962.
ROTWEIN, E. Flirting with Apriorism: Caldwell on Mises. History of Political Economy, v.18, n. 4, s/l, 1986.
SEN, A. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, n. 6, s/l, 1977, p. 317-344.
Copyright (c) 2018 Felipe Rosa da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.